Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Teenage Girl Banned by the Football Association For Asking Transgender Opponent ?Are You a Man?? Win... Sat May 10, 2025 11:00 | Toby Young
The teenage girl given a six-match ban by the FA for asking a bearded opponent whether he was a ban has had the sanction overturned with the help of the Free Speech Union.
The post Teenage Girl Banned by the Football Association For Asking Transgender Opponent ?Are You a Man?? Wins Appeal With Help of Free Speech Union appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Reflections on Empire, Papacy and States Sat May 10, 2025 09:00 | James Alexander
A new Pope, a new US-UK trade deal, a new accord between China and Russia. Professor James Alexander takes the long view and sees how the accidents of 2000 years of Western history are playing out in 2025.
The post Reflections on Empire, Papacy and States appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Ed Miliband?s Housing Energy Plan Will Decimate the Rental Market and Send Rents Spiralling Sat May 10, 2025 07:00 | Ben Pile
Ed Miliband's plan to force all rental homes to have EPC C or above by 2030 is a recipe for higher rents and fewer rentals, says Ben Pile. Even at today's high energy prices, payback periods can extend into centuries.
The post Ed Miliband’s Housing Energy Plan Will Decimate the Rental Market and Send Rents Spiralling appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Sat May 10, 2025 01:33 | Toby Young
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ?Correcting? Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim Fri May 09, 2025 17:00 | Will Jones
The BBC has quietly edited Question Time after wrongly 'correcting' Reform's Richard Tice on a claim about CO2 emissions. Tice said humans are behind just 4% of emissions but Fiona Bruce falsely said it was a third.
The post BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en
Voltaire Network >>
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (3 of 3)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3of course. But this would necesitate a greater number of practising litigants the lawyers than any people civilised, barbarian or just plain stupid could bear; the perfect democrqcy of LAW for all mqy not exist. Thanks to TV we all feel just a little bit familiar with how to be a lawyer, well a US prosecution or defence lawyer àt least;
do you really want the logical conclusion of the democrats wish?
do you really think human nature so feeble that it could not sustain genuine anarchism?
or do you await "lawyers and lawsuits for All?
dont pay attention to me though I am merely a noted eccentric.
Your case will undoubtably succeed? Did this hit you in the shower one morning, or are you just filled with eternal wisdom? OK, I'm kidding - but it helps not to be so sure, the only way you can go is down from there
I agree that the Legal Aid Board is an absolute mess, however put yourself in the position of someone employed by the Irish government - for all that we know based on your article, your case could be vindictive and spurious and based upon a personal vendetta against this worker. Should there then be an unqualified stream of funding to harass this person further? I'm not saying that you are doing this by any means - but allowing the board some discretion is actually a good idea. There should be safeguards against abuse (which would probably help you out) rather than a lack of any controls.
Having said that, I don't think the answer always in the law - and it rarely lies in the lining of barristers' pockets! I'm not quite sure that "in a genuine democracy every citizen would have the right and the means to sue any branch of the government and to sue any person employed by the government". Again I don't see why government workers should be personally more responsible than private sector workers. I agree that there should be a 'remedy' but not necessarily the 'means to sue'. The American litigation-culture has not necessarily brought about a fairer quality of government, but it has brought about a lot more lawyers. Certainly the right to sue exists generally at present but of course the problem is money. Personally I'd prefer a change in lawyer's fees (ouch, he says, shooting himself in the foot) rather than an increase in legal aid payments.
But in any case - especially if you are going to represent yourself (and it's not all that bad - there have been some famous victories over the state in that context) - good luck :)
People rarely get legal aid for personal injury. It's not a conspiracy it is just how it is. Legal aid is generally only given for crime because you need it. Your liberty is at stake. Your making a conspiracy theory out of a policy in force for years. People get refused legal aid for suing non state bodies for personal injury all the time. Your not being screwed by the system. That's how it works.