Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
News Round-Up Sat May 03, 2025 01:28 | Toby Young A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Gas Boiler Ban to Be Fast-Tracked as New Homes Required to Have Heat Pumps and Solar Panels Fri May 02, 2025 17:00 | Will Jones Gas boilers in new homes will be banned as soon as next year and they will be required to have heat pumps and solar panels under plans being spearheaded by Ed Miliband and Angela Rayner.
The post Gas Boiler Ban to Be Fast-Tracked as New Homes Required to Have Heat Pumps and Solar Panels appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
AfD Classified as Extreme-Right by German Intelligence, Paving Way for Ban Fri May 02, 2025 15:00 | Will Jones The AfD has been designated as Right-wing extremist by Germany's Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, enabling surveillance of the party to be ramped up and paving the way for it to be banned.
The post AfD Classified as Extreme-Right by German Intelligence, Paving Way for Ban appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Making Sense of Trump?s Tariffs Fri May 02, 2025 13:00 | Ramesh Thakur There's method in Trump's tariff madness, says Ramesh Thakur. Uniting his America First, anti-Net Zero and anti-DEI policies is an imperative to untangle the US from strategic dependence on an ascendant China.
The post Making Sense of Trump’s Tariffs appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Capture of the IMF and World Bank by Eco-Zealots is Hurting Poorer Countries Most Fri May 02, 2025 11:00 | Tilak Doshi The IMF and World Bank have been captured by eco-zealots and lost sight of their original purpose, says Tilak Doshi. Developing countries, desperate for energy and growth, are the biggest losers.
The post The Capture of the IMF and World Bank by Eco-Zealots is Hurting Poorer Countries Most appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
European Greens unite
international |
politics / elections |
opinion/analysis
Monday March 08, 2004 14:10 by Jolly Giant

but are they a radical alternative?
Die Gruenen, Les Verts, the Green Party - the German, French and UK Green Parties, along with 29 other European Green parties, are now one party standing on one platform. This move comes ahead of the European Parliament elections in June, in which the Greens hope to make gains. The unification of the Greens into a continental fighting force will not be straightforward. Whilst they now have one party hymn (by film music composer Ennio Morricone) there are significant differences between the various national components, not least on the question of the EU itself and its forthcoming enlargement.
In the UK, the Green Party are still a relatively radical party. For example, they were opposed to the recent invasion of Iraq and they put forward a number of progressive reforms that as socialists we would critically support. They are easily to the left of the Liberal Democrats and New Labour - although all three support the continuation of the capitalist system.
The two Green MEPs (one for London and one for the South East) were both active in the anti-war movement. However, they failed to draw the necessary conclusions.
Firstly, that war is inherent in the nature of capitalism due to the continual drive for profits and resources and the failure of the system to overcome national divisions. Secondly, that to actually stop the war would have required a movement that put the continued rule of the capitalist class in Britain in danger. Thirdly, that to stop future wars the capitalist system must be overthrown and replaced by a democratic socialist society internationally.
However, their consistent anti-war stance is markedly to the left of Die Gruenen, the German Greens who prop up the Social Democratic government. While it is true that they opposed the last war in Iraq (along with practically the whole of Germany), they supported the NATO bombing of Serbia in 1999.
Because of this, their capitulation on nuclear transportation and their propping up of the SDP government carrying out Thatcherite anti-working class reforms, Die Gruenen have been exposed. This rightward shift is not accidental and it is not an isolated example. In a number of other European countries the Greens have also propped up Social Democratic governments.
There are a number of reasons why the Greens start out as 'radical' but then rapidly drift to the right once they get an ounce of governmental influence or a few ministerial positions.
Fundamentally, these reasons all come back to their lack of a clear programme to change society. They propose the impossible - that capitalism becomes an environmentally sound system. Capitalism exploits labour and the environment for profit. This is an unalterable fact they refuse to accept.
Whilst in opposition the Greens propose a number of good reforms that socialists would most likely support whilst pointing out their limitations. However, because they accept the constraints of the system they are forced to adopt more 'practical', less radical politics when in power. In other words, they abandon their principles.
In order to justify this they argue that "baby steps are best". Of course it is true, access to political power can force through some minor changes. However, in order to protect the environment and ensure the future existence of humanity what are needed are fundamental changes.
Only by bringing the important sectors of the economy into public ownership, under democratic control, can a serious start be made at protecting the environment. Whilst they remain in private hands they will be run in the interests of private profit.
In the game of Monopoly, players do not volunteer to miss a turn in order to conserve energy by not moving their counter round the board. Nor do they all agree to not throw the dice and only move along one space at a time!
For the time being, the UK Greens remain far more radical than their European friends. Once they get any measure of power however, their capitulation is almost guaranteed - unless of course they break with capitalism.
Because of the lack of a mass working class socialist party to the left of Labour, some people will continue to look towards the Greens as a radical alternative.
The question of the environment necessitates fundamental and far reaching answers. The Greens have no such answers. When the Greens capitulate to the constraints of the system and adopt a more 'realpolitik' approach however, it is possible that more radical elements will be won over to the struggle for a socialist society.
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (10 of 10)
Jump To Comment: 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1maybe the mainstream greens arent concerned with the 'far' left minority. It seems that they may have made a pragmatic choice that they can make more changes within the ring of power rather than heckling from the sideline. If you have to drop your line on some issues to get a broader consensus on others, so be it (no matter how hard it is on principle). thats politics init.
although i dont know anything about anything.
does not even dare to represent all _green_ opinion.
It is a mark of some serious negotiation and concensus building that Green Parties with such differing social policy outlook and history as those who form the new alliance, could come together.
They are a lot of people, do not think to reduce them to your local comhaontas glas.
Maybe the accusations made against the irish greens signal a need or a wish to build a more "left" green option, or more simply internalised "more left green" concerns in other "left parties.
And never ever understimate the green contigent in the european anarchist networks.
what do they say / forty shades of green?
"college dropouts from wealthy families "
I disagree. The Greens are all graduates. Just look at all those letters after their names. They all tend to be Architects for some reason. That's a 5 year course with high points and with no chance of a working classs person getting in.
"The SP is not a joke to the thousands of non payers of bin tax in this city."
I think you might find that thousands of non-payers are unaware of the SP.
The SP is not a joke to the thousands of non payers of bin tax in this city.
The Greens voted in and are in favour of bin tax including non collection, it is the Greens that are the joke.
....but not as big a joke as the Socialists.
no more please
the irish greens are middle class muppets.
the right winger richard greene was involved for ages and nobody spoke out.
their policies are paper dreams as they are unwilling to challenge the other parties lest they become too radical.
college dropouts from wealthy families and million dollar stock options.
in this case, greens aren't good for you.
The Irish GP are right wingers do people remember
Chemical Cuffe's portfolio...
Bin Tax...
Kicking and jeering anti war protesters on Day X outside the Dail...
Support for war with UN mandate...
Im more than tired of hearing the 'overthrow capitalism' dogma without any substance to its course. This 'one or the other' mentality is for the shelves.