North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?
US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty
Anti-Empire >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
The Truth About Britain?s Wildfires Thu Aug 21, 2025 15:00 | Paul Homewood
It is simplistic to blame the recent spike in wildfires on climate change, writes Paul Homewood. A more likely cause is the rewilding of uplands, supposedly to cut carbon emissions, and poor management of forested land.
The post The Truth About Britain?s Wildfires appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lucy Connolly and Ricky Jones: the System Worked as Intended Thu Aug 21, 2025 13:00 | Nick Rendell
Lucy Connolly's jail sentence versus Ricky Jones's acquittal shows not two-tier justice but two-tier laws ? the system worked as intended, says Nick Rendell.
The post Lucy Connolly and Ricky Jones: the System Worked as Intended appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Dramatic Slowdown in Melting of Arctic Sea Ice Surprises Scientists (But Not Climate Sceptics) Thu Aug 21, 2025 11:00 | Toby Young
The Guardian, of all papers, has acknowledged that predictions about the disappearance of Arctic sea ice may ? just may ? have been exaggerated. Paging Gore Vidal: Can we have that prize back please?
The post Dramatic Slowdown in Melting of Arctic Sea Ice Surprises Scientists (But Not Climate Sceptics) appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Starmer Accused of Hypocrisy Over Lucy Connolly Prosecution Thu Aug 21, 2025 09:00 | Toby Young
As Director of Public Prosecutions, Keir Starmer urged restraint when it came to prosecuting people for social media posts. Why, then, was the book thrown at Lucy Connolly?
The post Starmer Accused of Hypocrisy Over Lucy Connolly Prosecution appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Climate Change Committee?s 2015 Fifth Carbon Budget Over-Estimated the Price of Gas in 2025 and ... Thu Aug 21, 2025 07:00 | Ben Pile
The Climate Change Committee's Fifth Carbon Budget, produced 10 years ago, got its predictions about the price of gas in 2025 and the price of renewables predictably wrong, says Ben Pile.
The post The Climate Change Committee?s 2015 Fifth Carbon Budget Over-Estimated the Price of Gas in 2025 and Under-Estimated the Price of Renewables appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en
Voltaire Network >>
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (6 of 6)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6The earlier story on Indymedia about a meeting in relation to this also some additional information worth reading for anyone interested in this topic.
See
Thanks for that link Terence and for the work you've put into your comments on this story; it's all been very helpful.
For those with audio, here is a clip of a statement from one protestor yesterday. The sound quality is not very good as it was recorded on my mp3 player. I'm meeting this man (probably later today) for a fuller interview, which I'll get transcribed and uploaded later in the week.
Eyrecourt Wikipedia link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyrecourt
Statement from one protestor
The presence of human waste from hospitals in the water is particularly worrying because of the high concentration of anti-biotic drugs and other drugs administered to patients while in hospitals. This waste should be treated seperately because of this. Where the drugs administered to patients is ultimately for the better of the patient if it is released untreated back into the eco-system will in time cause irreperable damage to the soil, water and plant life and ultimately damage humans.
It would be useful to get more information about the source of sludge for various other operations that are spreading it on land.
I know that up to a few years ago the sludge generated (from Dublin) at the Ringsend sewage works just to be transport daily on a small barge (the Sir Joseph Bazalgette?) and dumped at sea not far off Howth Head. This could have been up to 10 miles off-shore, but I can't be sure. Apparently there is an area of the sea around there where there is a relatively deep. The dumping sludge at sea stopped as a result of an EU directive which banned it, as the North Sea was a regular dumping ground by countries around it such as the UK.
It seems now that according to this document: http://www.dublincity.ie/Images/Dublin%20Bay%20Project%...5.pdf -this is what happens to the sludge.
Sludge is a by-product of the treatment of wastewater. At Ringsend it is treated using hydrolysis and digestion before being thermally dried at air temperatures of 450°C, killing pathogens and producing a pasteurised, organic based fertiliser. It is marketed under the name “Biofert” and is spread on tillage and grass in Leinster. It is granular, practically odourless and contains valuable nutrients and organic matter. 25,000 tonnes of Biofert is produced at the Ringsend Treatment Works each year. Sludge at Ringsend is particularly rich in nutrients because Dublin’s main industries include major food and drink companies like Guinness and Cadbury. It is also very low in metal levels. Biofert has only 10% of the metal levels permitted by the EU for sludge product used in agriculture.
So who if anyone is testing this material? Where are the results and can we trust them?
And as to regulations in Ireland & EU as to what can go into Sewage Sludge, it is outlined in this document: http://www.fingalcoco.ie/YourLocalCouncil/Services/Wate...5.pdf
B4. SEWAGE SLUDGE IN AGRICULTURE
The Directive (Council Directive 86/278/EEC on the protection of the environment, and in particular of the soil, when sewage sludge is used in agriculture) regulates the use of sewage sludge in agriculture in such a way that contamination of soil and pollution of water does not occur from metal contaminants, nitrates and phosphates. The Directive prescribes standards for these constituents. The Directive is currently implemented by the Waste Management (Use of Sewage Sludge in Agriculture) Regulations (S.I. No 148, 1998) which revoked the European Communities (Use of Sewage Sludge in Agriculture) Regulations, 1991
This legislation applies to sludge from sewage plants, septic tanks and other installations for the treatment of sewage and residual sludge from any kind of plant. The use of sludge is prohibited where the concentration of heavy metals in soil exceeds the specified values or where the use of sludge may result in those values being exceeded. The maximum amount of sludge that may be applied is 2 tonnes of dry matter per hectare per year. Local authorities are obliged to supervise the supply and use of sludge in their areas.
There seems to be some discussion of this here: http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/ZZSI148Y1998.html
But here is where things get interesting. According to the application to the EPA about the Poolbeg / Ringsend incinerator there is an option to incinerate 80,000 tonnes per annum of this stuff. The key question though is: What are the regulations about using incinerator ash for 'fertilizer' and do the same regulations for unburnt sludge apply? Probably not.
This issue about the proposal to incinerator the sludge can be found at the URL below. The text is:
The application to the EPA details that 80,000 tonnes per annum of sewage sludge from the adjacent Tertiary Treatment Works will be incinerated in the plant. This is contrary to all statements at the Information Days run by DCC in Ringsend. Mr Matt Twomey explicitly denied on many occasions that sewage sludge would be burnt.
The principal reference in the EIS to sewage sludge is on page 5-7 as follows:
Sludge Pipeline
5.5.39. In the event that land spreading of sludge will no longer be an option due to
environmental constraints, it will be possible to pump the sludge directly to the proposed WtE Facility for thermal treatment. It is intended to provide a sludge pipeline from the Ringsend Wastewater Treatment Works.[our emphasis] The sludge would be pumped from the Ringsend Wastewater Treatment Works and injected into the waste feed hoppers.
Here we find, buried deep in the EIS and in the middle of a paragraph, the most important sentence in the whole document.....
article continues
does anyone have a number for the protestors? thanks
Hi Nicola,
You should be able to find contact details for the campaign on the campaign site at stopspreadingsewage.org.
There're two phone numbers on the Main Page.
If they are not who you are looking for you're welcome to contact me at the email address educate4free @ gmail . com (sorry I'm not giving my phone number online here, but I work as a teacher and the hassle of having my number in the public domain isn't worth it).
Regards,
Mark